Our Blog

Newly Published Guidance For Non-Statin Therapies from the American College of Cardiology (ACC)

By: Joyce L Ross, MSN, CRNP, Clinical Lipid Specialist, FNLA, FPCNA

In April 2016, an expert consensus decision pathway on the role of Non-statin therapies for lowering LDL-C in the management of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk was published in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology. This document, which was endorsed by the National Lipid Association, provides practical guidance for clinicians and patients in situations that were not covered by the joint 2013 ACC/AHA guidelines. Since the publication of the last guidelines the Food and Drug Administration has approved a new class of medications termed proprotein convertase subtillisin/kexin 9 or most often referred to as PCSK9 Inhibitors for at high-risk patients who may require additional therapies to bring the LDL-C to a more acceptable threshold. The recent results of the HPS2-THRIVE and IMPROVE-IT trials have also provided new data that provided new evidence with regard to the addition of second non-statin agents when additional lowering is warranted.

The algorithms found within the document provide a suggested clinical workflow for consideration of additional non-statin therapies. Ten points are highlighted to assist the provider to fully understand and implement its recommendations.

  1. The decision pathway was created to address GAPS in recommendations for LDL-C lowering to reduce ASCVD in high-risk subsets based on RECENT clinical trial evidence and the introduction of a new class of lipid lowering medication
  2. The 2013 ACC/AHA cholesterol guideline identified four major statin benefit groups which remain intact and include:
    a. Patients > 21 with clinical ASCVD
    b. adults > 21 years of age with LDL-C > 190 mg/dL (after ruling out secondary             causes)
    c. adults 40-75 years old WITHOUT known ASCVD but with diabetes, with LDL-C 70-189 mg/dL,
    d. adults 40-75 years WITHOUT ASCVD or diabetes, with an LDL-C 70-189 mg/dL, and an estimated 10 year risk for ASCVD of > 7.5%, as determined by the pooled cohort equations.
  3. The 2013 guideline recommended using either-high or moderate-intensity statin therapy for primary and secondary prevention, with dose adjustments as identified for adverse effects, elderly population, co-morbidities or drug-drug interaction.
  4. The evidence-based recommendations from the 2013 guidelines provided the framework for the newest guideline and incorporated the most recent clinical trial data and the newly approved PCSK9 Inhibitors.
  5. Three questions were utilized to provide more detailed recommendations for specific patient scenarios.
    a. In what patient populations should non-statin therapies be considered?
    b. In what situations should non-statin therapies be considered?
    c. If non-statin therapies are to be added, which agents or therapies should be considered and in what order?
  6. All pathways recommendations include assurance that the patient is consistent with ongoing healthy lifestyle recommendations.
  7. Fasting LDL-C levels should be assessed regularly after the initiation of lipid-lowering medications, and every 3-12 months thereafter as appropriate.
  8. In cases of suspected statin intolerance the provider should include temporary discontinuation of statin therapy, lower dosing, re-challenge preferably with 2-3 different statins witch utilize different metabolic pathways, and intermittent (1-3 Xs weekly) dosing of long half-life statins
  9. In selected high-risk patients (those with existing ASCVD or those with an LDL-C > 190 mg/dL), use of non-statin therapies may be considered if MAXIMALLY tolerated statin therapy has NOT achieved > 50% reduction in LDL-C from baseline.
  10. Guidance on other factors are also provided including the absolute LDL-C level achieved, the extend of available scientific evidence for safety and tolerability, potential for drug-drug interactions, efficacy of additional LDL-C lowering in ASCVD event reduction, cost, convenience and medication storage, pill burden, route of administration, potential to jeopardize adherence to evidence based therapies, and importantly, patient preferences.

The panel emphasized that LDL-C levels are not firm triggers for adding medication, however there are factors that may be considered within the broader context of an individual’s clinical situation. Specific recommendations for add on mediations include:

  1. A referral to a lipid specialist or registered dietitian may be considered for higher-risk patients with statin intolerance, and is strongly encouraged for patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH).
  2. Ezetimibe (Zetia) is the first non-statin medication that should be considered for most patients.
  3. Bile acid sequestrants (BAS) may be considered as second-line therapy who are not able to tolerate ezetimibe, but they should be avoided in patient with triglycerides > 300 mg/dL.
  4. PCSK9 Inhibitors may be considered if LDL goals are not achieved on maximally tolerated statin and ezetimibe therapy in higher-risk patients with ASCVD or FH. These agents are NOT recommended in primary prevention patients who do not have FH.
  5. In patients with homozygous hypercholesterolemia (HoFH), referral to a lipid specialist is strongly recommended, for potential considerations for use of lomitapide, mipomerson and LDL apheresis as necessary

References: Adapted from: 1) http://www.acc.org/latest in cardiology/ten points to remember 2016. (2) Http://www.lipid.org/nla/acc16-american college cardiology scientific sessions highlights